A Review Of trade secret case law
A Review Of trade secret case law
Blog Article
Given that the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the figured out counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession of your subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this element for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Usually, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (which include Those people in apparent violation of founded case regulation) on the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, along with the case will not be appealed, the decision will stand.
13. The Supreme Court has held that the moment the act of misconduct is set up as well as the employee is found guilty after because of process of legislation, it's the prerogative of your employer to decide the quantum of punishment, outside of the varied penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is just not proportionate with the seriousness on the act of misconduct is just not suitable although the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in the structured and lawful method. Read more
one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were advised with the boy’s past, they asked if their children were safe with him in their home. The therapist confident them that they'd practically nothing to worry about.
If you find an error inside the information of a published opinion (such as a misspelled name or possibly a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
Only the written opinions of your Supreme Court plus the Court of Appeals are routinely accessible. Decisions of your decreased (trial) courts are usually not generally published or distributed.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of the police will be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, make certain law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to the offender as well as Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case regulation in a very particular court. Indeed, Every single circuit has its very own list of binding case law. Because of this, a judgment rendered while in the Ninth Circuit will not be binding within the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
Any court could seek to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to succeed in a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually well proven now that the provision for proforma promotion is just not alien or unfamiliar into the civil servant service framework but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it truly is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may well if glad that a civil servant who was entitled to get promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his possess, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province while in the higher post, direct that these civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay back and allowances of these types of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, more info the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.